Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled in South Africa
South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled was 480,000 current US$ in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled in South Africa, 1994–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled in South Africa is 480,000 current US$, measured in 2008.
That represents a change of down 83.4% on the previous year and down 66.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled in South Africa peaked at 3.40 million current US$ in 2003 and was at its lowest, 250,000 current US$, in 1994.
That places South Africa 100th out of 172 countries with data for 2008, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled in South Africa, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 250,000 current US$ | — |
| 1995 | 660,000 current US$ | +164.0% |
| 1996 | 690,000 current US$ | +4.5% |
| 1997 | 1.94 million current US$ | +181.2% |
| 1998 | 1.41 million current US$ | -27.3% |
| 1999 | 2.80 million current US$ | +98.6% |
| 2000 | 2.75 million current US$ | -1.8% |
| 2001 | 2.63 million current US$ | -4.4% |
| 2002 | 3.18 million current US$ | +20.9% |
| 2003 | 3.40 million current US$ | +6.9% |
| 2004 | 3.02 million current US$ | -11.2% |
| 2005 | 3.13 million current US$ | +3.6% |
| 2006 | 1.71 million current US$ | -45.4% |
| 2007 | 2.89 million current US$ | +69.0% |
| 2008 | 480,000 current US$ | -83.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.29 million current US$ | 250,000 current US$ | 2.80 million current US$ | 6 |
| 2000s | 2.58 million current US$ | 480,000 current US$ | 3.40 million current US$ | 9 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
- 99 Togo 490,000 current US$ compare
- 100 Paraguay 480,000 current US$ compare
- 102 United Arab Emirates 470,000 current US$
- 102 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 470,000 current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Africa
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 789,470 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 7.80 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 66.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 80.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 20.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 314.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 111.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 18.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 6.66 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled in South Africa?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled in South Africa was 480,000 current US$ in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 3.40 million current US$ in 2003.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 250,000 current US$ in 1994.
- How does South Africa rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- South Africa ranks 100th out of 172 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is down 66.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.