Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Azerbaijan, 1993–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2008, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Azerbaijan stood at 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 20.3% on the previous year and up 591.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Azerbaijan peaked at 17.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.3605 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
Azerbaijan ranks 81st of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Azerbaijan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 0.3605 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1994 | 0.8412 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.3% |
| 1995 | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.9% |
| 1996 | 0.4807 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.5% |
| 1997 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +275.0% |
| 1998 | 0.9628 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.6% |
| 1999 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.9% |
| 2000 | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +131.5% |
| 2001 | 4.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2002 | 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2003 | 6.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 2004 | 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2005 | 17.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.7% |
| 2006 | 17.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 8.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.7% |
| 2008 | 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3605 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2000s | 8.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
- 78 Panama 6.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 79 Senegal 6.96 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 80 Kyrgyzstan 6.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 82 United Arab Emirates 6.62 current US$ per square kilometre
- 83 Estonia 6.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 84 Israel 6.47 current US$ per square kilometre
More aid effectiveness data for Azerbaijan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.16 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 750,606 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 89,908 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 19.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 24.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 817,785 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -13.40 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Azerbaijan?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Azerbaijan was 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was 17.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3605 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Azerbaijan ranks 81st out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 591.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.