Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Central African Republic
Central African Republic: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 0.8026 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Central African Republic, 1969–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2008, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Central African Republic stood at 0.8026 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 76.6% on the previous year and down 43.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Central African Republic peaked at 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.1284 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
That places Central African Republic 136th out of 169 countries with data for 2008, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Central African Republic, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 0.2408 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0.1284 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.7% |
| 1971 | 0.2087 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1972 | 0.4013 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.3% |
| 1973 | 0.4334 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1974 | 0.6742 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.6% |
| 1975 | 0.7865 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1976 | 0.7384 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1977 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 1978 | 0.8829 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1979 | 0.7063 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1980 | 0.2889 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.1% |
| 1981 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +316.7% |
| 1982 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1983 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 1985 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1986 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 1987 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1988 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1989 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1990 | 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.9% |
| 1991 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 1993 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.9% |
| 1994 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 1995 | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.7% |
| 1996 | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.6% |
| 1997 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1998 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.9% |
| 1999 | 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.8% |
| 2000 | 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2001 | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.1% |
| 2002 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.3% |
| 2003 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 4.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.1% |
| 2005 | 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2006 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.7% |
| 2007 | 3.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.5% |
| 2008 | 0.8026 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2408 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2408 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2408 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1970s | 0.6019 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1284 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2889 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2000s | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8026 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Central African Republic
- 133 Iraq 0.846 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 134 Türkiye 0.8316 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Namibia 0.826 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 137 Bhutan 0.7871 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 138 Botswana 0.7764 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Mongolia 0.7705 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central African Republic
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 14,134 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 230,599 current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 8.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 138.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.33 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 47.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 40.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.13 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 7.34 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Central African Republic?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Central African Republic was 0.8026 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Central African Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Central African Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1284 current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Central African Republic rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Central African Republic ranks 136th out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Central African Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is down 43.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central African Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.