Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Post-demographic dividend
Post-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 0.1788 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Post-demographic dividend, 1970–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Post-demographic dividend is 0.1788 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2008.
The figure is down 11.3% on the previous year and down 45.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Post-demographic dividend peaked at 0.3986 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0.0172 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
Post-demographic dividend ranks 26th of 47 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Post-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.0354 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.0337 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1972 | 0.0344 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0357 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0406 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1975 | 0.0482 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0456 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1977 | 0.0492 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0565 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0486 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0172 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.6% |
| 1981 | 0.1001 current US$ per square kilometre | +482.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0753 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 1983 | 0.1018 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1984 | 0.0906 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0962 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1986 | 0.1018 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1987 | 0.1236 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1988 | 0.1005 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1989 | 0.1305 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1990 | 0.1656 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1991 | 0.2135 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.9% |
| 1992 | 0.204 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1993 | 0.2236 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1994 | 0.2236 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.3411 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.6% |
| 1996 | 0.2546 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 1997 | 0.2849 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1998 | 0.3303 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1999 | 0.3986 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 2000 | 0.2906 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.1% |
| 2001 | 0.3031 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2002 | 0.2664 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 2003 | 0.3459 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 2004 | 0.2568 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 2005 | 0.1796 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 2006 | 0.1681 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2007 | 0.2016 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 2008 | 0.1788 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0428 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0337 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0565 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0938 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0172 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1305 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.264 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1656 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3986 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2434 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1681 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3459 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Post-demographic dividend
- 23 Lebanon 96.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Bahrain 95.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Cape Verde 84.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Bahamas 78.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Northern Mariana Islands 65.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Armenia 57.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Kiribati 49.38 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Post-demographic dividend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 100.92 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 64.37 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.21 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 10.66 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 267.26 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.04 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 526.26 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 428.19 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 366.76 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 712.73 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Post-demographic dividend?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Post-demographic dividend was 0.1788 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3986 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0172 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Post-demographic dividend rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Post-demographic dividend ranks 26th out of 47 groups with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Post-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 45.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Post-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.