Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Tajikistan
Tajikistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Tajikistan, 1992–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Tajikistan is 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2008.
That represents a change of down 51.0% on the previous year and up 196.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Tajikistan peaked at 15.43 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
Tajikistan ranks 88th of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Tajikistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.643 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1994 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.8% |
| 1995 | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.8% |
| 1996 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1997 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 1998 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1999 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.2% |
| 2000 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2002 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 2003 | 5.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +204.0% |
| 2004 | 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2005 | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 2006 | 15.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +137.4% |
| 2007 | 11.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 2008 | 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Tajikistan
- 85 Bangladesh 6.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 86 Guatemala 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 87 Guinea-Bissau 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 89 Uganda 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Lithuania 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Viet Nam 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tajikistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 190,855 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 320,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 108,440 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 65.15 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 24.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 898,301 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 430,843 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 72,820 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 24.64 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Tajikistan?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Tajikistan was 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Tajikistan?
- The highest recorded value was 15.43 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Tajikistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Tajikistan rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Tajikistan ranks 88th out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Tajikistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 196.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tajikistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.