Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 0.8487 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Uzbekistan, 1992–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Uzbekistan is 0.8487 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2008.
That represents a change of down 68.1% on the previous year and up 44.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Uzbekistan peaked at 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0235 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
Uzbekistan ranks 132nd of 169 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0235 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.094 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 1994 | 0.1646 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 1995 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +585.7% |
| 1996 | 0.4466 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.4% |
| 1997 | 0.6347 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.1% |
| 1998 | 0.5877 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1999 | 0.8698 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 2000 | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.5% |
| 2001 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2002 | 0.8029 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 2003 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.4% |
| 2004 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2005 | 3.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.1% |
| 2006 | 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2007 | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2008 | 0.8487 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4937 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0235 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8029 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
- 129 Nigeria 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 130 Mozambique 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 131 Ethiopia 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 133 Iraq 0.846 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 134 Türkiye 0.8316 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Namibia 0.826 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Uzbekistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 5,038 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 82,995 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 18.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 98.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 887,887 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 238.66 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Uzbekistan?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Uzbekistan was 0.8487 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0235 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Uzbekistan ranks 132nd out of 169 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 44.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.