Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 111.54 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 41.6 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 32nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 31st of 46 groups.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0031 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.15 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1970s | 0.0728 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.74 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1980s | 0.059 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,997 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,997 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 0.2733 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,915 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,915 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Hong Kong, China?
- 111.54 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Hong Kong, China?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 1996.
- How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 32nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 31st of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.