Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) is 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 65.4% on the previous year and up 647.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 8.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) 32nd out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.1004 current US$ per square kilometre | +700.0% |
| 1975 | 0.1631 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1976 | 0.1506 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0878 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 1978 | 0.0251 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.4% |
| 1979 | 0.1631 current US$ per square kilometre | +550.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0502 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.2% |
| 1981 | 0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0251 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1983 | 0.2007 current US$ per square kilometre | +700.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0878 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0376 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1986 | 0.0502 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1987 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0.1129 current US$ per square kilometre | +800.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0376 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1991 | 0.276 current US$ per square kilometre | +633.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0414 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.0% |
| 1993 | 0.1708 current US$ per square kilometre | +312.5% |
| 1994 | 0.2346 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.4% |
| 1995 | 0.521 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.1% |
| 1996 | 0.6314 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 1997 | 0.2312 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.4% |
| 1998 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1999 | 8.75 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2000 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.2% |
| 2001 | 0.1516 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0499 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0689 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 2004 | 0.0964 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0534 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.6% |
| 2006 | 0.0271 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.3% |
| 2007 | 0.1777 current US$ per square kilometre | +556.3% |
| 2008 | 0.0542 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.5% |
| 2009 | 0.0169 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.7% |
| 2010 | 0.1879 current US$ per square kilometre | +1010.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0745 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.4% |
| 2012 | 0.8092 current US$ per square kilometre | +986.4% |
| 2013 | 0.3673 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.6% |
| 2014 | 0.0186 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.9% |
| 2015 | 0.1117 current US$ per square kilometre | +499.8% |
| 2016 | 0.1551 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.8% |
| 2017 | 0.2122 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 2018 | 0.1174 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0986 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2020 | 0.8251 current US$ per square kilometre | +736.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0493 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.0% |
| 2022 | 7.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +16003.0% |
| 2023 | 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 0.0728 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1631 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.059 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2007 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1731 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0169 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2153 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0186 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8092 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0493 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- 29 Nepal 128.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Indonesia 115.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Hong Kong, China 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Trinidad and Tobago 93.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 French Polynesia 90.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Saint Lucia 86.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Bhutan 82.45 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 8.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 32nd out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 647.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.