Hong Kong, China vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 112.16 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 53.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 160 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 21.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2787 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.53 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1980s | 3,997 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,995 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 1,915 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,912 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Hong Kong, China or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Hong Kong, China, at 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- 112.16 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1996.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.