Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) recorded 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in 2022.
The figure is up 12.0% on the previous year and down 81.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0636 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
That places Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) 33rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.072 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.0636 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1972 | 0.069 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0953 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 1974 | 0.2244 current US$ per square kilometre | +135.4% |
| 1975 | 0.4215 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.8% |
| 1976 | 0.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.8% |
| 1977 | 0.4454 current US$ per square kilometre | +218.1% |
| 1978 | 0.5501 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 1979 | 0.7055 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 1980 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.1% |
| 1981 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.1% |
| 1982 | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.1% |
| 1983 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1984 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1985 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 1986 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1987 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1988 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 1989 | 3.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.8% |
| 1990 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1991 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 1992 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.9% |
| 1993 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 1994 | 2.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.1% |
| 1995 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1996 | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1997 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 1998 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 1999 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2000 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2001 | 0.9905 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 2002 | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2003 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2004 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2005 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2006 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 2007 | 2.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.1% |
| 2008 | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2009 | 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2010 | 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.6% |
| 2011 | 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.9% |
| 2012 | 11.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2013 | 11.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2014 | 5.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.7% |
| 2015 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 2016 | 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 2017 | 5.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.9% |
| 2018 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.6% |
| 2019 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2020 | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2021 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2022 | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.2787 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0636 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7055 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9905 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 30 Indonesia 115.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Hong Kong, China 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Trinidad and Tobago 93.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 French Polynesia 90.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Saint Lucia 86.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Bhutan 82.45 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Malta 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.53 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 427.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.13 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 511.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.46 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.18 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.07 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 306.28 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) was 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0636 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 81.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.