Malta vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Malta
62.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1994
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2.13 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Malta rank
36th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
33rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Malta
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
01.0k2.0k3.0k196719942022

How they compare

Malta currently reports 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 60.37 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 29.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 160 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1970s 37.5 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4525 current US$ per square kilometre 37.05 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 555.56 current US$ per square kilometre 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre 553.59 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 93.75 current US$ per square kilometre 2.59 current US$ per square kilometre 91.16 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Malta or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Malta, at 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 1994.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Malta and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
60.37 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
18 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1994.
How do Malta and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Malta ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Malta vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.