Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Rwanda
48.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
49.8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
41st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
40th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0100200300400198320032023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 49.8 current US$ per square kilometre against 48.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Rwanda ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th of 160 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2010s 103 current US$ per square kilometre 83.74 current US$ per square kilometre 19.27 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 61.98 current US$ per square kilometre 19.19 current US$ per square kilometre 42.79 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Rwanda or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 49.8 current US$ per square kilometre against 48.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.4 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Rwanda ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/">Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.