Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 49.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Sao Tome and Principe, 2011–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Sao Tome and Principe stood at 49.8 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 207.9% on the previous year and down 85.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Sao Tome and Principe peaked at 333.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2017.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th of 160 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Sao Tome and Principe, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 135.42 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2012 | 125 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2013 | 333.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.7% |
| 2014 | 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.2% |
| 2015 | 37.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.7% |
| 2016 | 12.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.3% |
| 2017 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.5% |
| 2018 | 31.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +1536.2% |
| 2019 | 14.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.5% |
| 2020 | 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.5% |
| 2021 | 4.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2022 | 16.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +231.4% |
| 2023 | 49.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +207.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 83.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 333.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2020s | 19.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe
- 37 Burundi 60.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Singapore 59.7 current US$ per square kilometre
- 39 Syrian Arab Republic 51.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 48.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Dominica 44.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Jordan 44.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sao Tome and Principe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 13,869 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.41 million current US$ (2008)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 103,518 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 17.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 20,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1,293 current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 264,371 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 19,043 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 322,273 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.56 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Sao Tome and Principe was 49.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The highest recorded value was 333.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 85.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.