India vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps

India
12.92 million current US$
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
121.61 million current US$
in 2023
India rank
10th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
13th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time

  • India
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196019912023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 121.61 million current US$ against 12.92 million current US$ in India, a difference of 108.69 million current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 9.4 times India's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

India ranks 10th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 13th of 154 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 3.28 million current US$ 952,857 current US$ 2.33 million current US$ India
1970s 1.27 million current US$ 6.00 million current US$ 4.73 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 3.22 million current US$ 20.33 million current US$ 17.12 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s -900,000 current US$ 71.58 million current US$ 72.48 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s -957,000 current US$ 187.22 million current US$ 188.18 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 3.25 million current US$ 99.01 million current US$ 95.76 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 11.60 million current US$ 123.48 million current US$ 111.89 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, India or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 121.61 million current US$ against 12.92 million current US$ in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between India and Sub-Saharan Africa?
108.69 million current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Sub-Saharan Africa?
61 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do India and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
India ranks 10th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 13th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/india/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/india/sub-saharan-africa/">India vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 8,505 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.