Jamaica vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Jamaica
2.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
2.54 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
92nd
Malawi rank
90th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Jamaica
  • Malawi
050100150200196319932023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.27 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 92nd and Malawi ranks 90th of 153 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4243 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9608 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2046 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre 39.62 current US$ per square kilometre 37.86 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7076 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7375 current US$ per square kilometre 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Jamaica or Malawi?
Malawi, at 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Jamaica and Malawi?
0.27 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Malawi?
35 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Jamaica ranks 92nd and Malawi ranks 90th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/malawi/">Jamaica vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.