Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Jamaica
Jamaica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per was 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Jamaica, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Jamaica is 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 35.3% on the previous year and down 60.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Jamaica peaked at 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, -0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1964.
That places Jamaica 92nd out of 153 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per in Jamaica, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 3.69 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | -0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -125.0% |
| 1965 | -0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -200.0% |
| 1976 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1980 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1982 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1983 | 2.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1986 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1987 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 3.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 1991 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1992 | 2.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1993 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1994 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1995 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1996 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1998 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2000 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2003 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 2009 | 8.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.0% |
| 2010 | 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2011 | 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.3% |
| 2015 | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.2% |
| 2016 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2017 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2018 | 0.9335 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 2022 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +275.8% |
| 2023 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3693 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1980s | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1990s | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2010s | 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9335 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2020s | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Jamaica
- 89 Thailand 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Malawi 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Mali 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 93 Colombia 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 94 Trinidad and Tobago 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Latvia 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Jamaica
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24,581 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 208,545 current US$ (2018)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 9.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 20,000 current US$ (2006)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany -618,920 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 391,268 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 4.29 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 15,316 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.90 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Jamaica?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per in Jamaica was 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Jamaica?
- The highest recorded value was 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per recorded in Jamaica?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.9234 current US$ per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Jamaica rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
- Jamaica ranks 92nd out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per rising or falling in Jamaica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 60.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Jamaica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.