Central Europe and the Baltics vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps

Central Europe and the Baltics
10,000 current US$
in 2010
Sao Tome and Principe
1.41 million current US$
in 2008
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
43rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Sao Tome and Principe
050.0M100.0M150.0M197519922010

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.41 million current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 1.40 million current US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 141.0 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 44 groups.

Central Europe and the Baltics has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 29.35 million current US$ 12,500 current US$ 29.34 million current US$ Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 1.90 million current US$ 223,333 current US$ 1.68 million current US$ Central Europe and the Baltics

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Central Europe and the Baltics or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.41 million current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2008.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Central Europe and the Baltics and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.40 million current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Sao Tome and Principe?
14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2008.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/central-europe-and-the-baltics/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/central-europe-and-the-baltics/sao-tome-and-principe/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,426 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.