Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps was 1.41 million current US$ in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe, 1975–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Sao Tome and Principe recorded 1.41 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in 2008. That is the highest value across all 29 years on record.
That represents a change of up 131.1% on the previous year and up 14,000.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe peaked at 1.41 million current US$ in 2008 and was at its lowest, -190,000 current US$, in 2006.
That places Sao Tome and Principe 44th out of 151 countries with data for 2008, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 40,000 current US$ | — |
| 1976 | 60,000 current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1977 | 120,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1978 | 75,000 current US$ | -37.5% |
| 1979 | 30,000 current US$ | -60.0% |
| 1980 | 40,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1981 | 50,000 current US$ | +25.0% |
| 1982 | 60,000 current US$ | +20.0% |
| 1983 | 50,000 current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1984 | 40,000 current US$ | -20.0% |
| 1985 | 30,000 current US$ | -25.0% |
| 1986 | 20,000 current US$ | -33.3% |
| 1987 | 45,000 current US$ | +125.0% |
| 1988 | 70,000 current US$ | +55.6% |
| 1989 | 1.02 million current US$ | +1357.1% |
| 1990 | 30,000 current US$ | -97.1% |
| 1991 | 10,000 current US$ | -66.7% |
| 1992 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 2003 | -150,000 current US$ | -1600.0% |
| 2004 | -163,333 current US$ | +8.9% |
| 2005 | -176,667 current US$ | +8.2% |
| 2006 | -190,000 current US$ | +7.5% |
| 2007 | 610,000 current US$ | -421.1% |
| 2008 | 1.41 million current US$ | +131.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 65,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 120,000 current US$ | 5 |
| 1980s | 142,500 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 1.02 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 12,500 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 8 |
| 2000s | 223,333 current US$ | -190,000 current US$ | 1.41 million current US$ | 6 |
Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe
More aid effectiveness data for Sao Tome and Principe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 13,869 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.41 million current US$ (2008)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 103,518 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 17.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 20,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1,293 current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 264,371 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 19,043 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 322,273 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.56 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe was 1.41 million current US$ in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The highest recorded value was 1.41 million current US$ in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The lowest recorded value was -190,000 current US$ in 2006.
- How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th out of 151 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14,000.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.