Eswatini vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps
Eswatini
1,889 current US$
in 2017
Moldova
2,426 current US$
in 2023
Eswatini rank
141st
Moldova rank
139th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps over time
- Eswatini
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 2,426 current US$ against 1,889 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 537 current US$.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 141st and Moldova ranks 139th of 151 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100,000 current US$ | 110,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | Moldova |
| 2010s | 2,079 current US$ | 16,869 current US$ | 14,790 current US$ | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Eswatini or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 2,426 current US$ against 1,889 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Eswatini and Moldova?
- 537 current US$, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2017.
- How do Eswatini and Moldova rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Eswatini ranks 141st and Moldova ranks 139th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.