Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Eswatini
Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps was 1,889 current US$ in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Eswatini, 1970–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Eswatini recorded 1,889 current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in 2017.
The figure is up 1.9% on the previous year and down 99.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Eswatini peaked at 700,000 current US$ in 1992 and was at its lowest, 1,853 current US$, in 2016.
That places Eswatini 141st out of 151 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 30,000 current US$ | +200.0% |
| 1973 | 10,000 current US$ | -66.7% |
| 1974 | 20,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1975 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 30,000 current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1978 | 40,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1979 | 70,000 current US$ | +75.0% |
| 1980 | 40,000 current US$ | -42.9% |
| 1981 | 75,000 current US$ | +87.5% |
| 1982 | 110,000 current US$ | +46.7% |
| 1983 | 150,000 current US$ | +36.4% |
| 1984 | 190,000 current US$ | +26.7% |
| 1985 | 90,000 current US$ | -52.6% |
| 1986 | 620,000 current US$ | +588.9% |
| 1987 | 340,000 current US$ | -45.2% |
| 1988 | 380,000 current US$ | +11.8% |
| 1989 | 420,000 current US$ | +10.5% |
| 1990 | 10,000 current US$ | -97.6% |
| 1991 | 540,000 current US$ | +5300.0% |
| 1992 | 700,000 current US$ | +29.6% |
| 1993 | 360,000 current US$ | -48.6% |
| 1994 | 290,000 current US$ | -19.4% |
| 1995 | 340,000 current US$ | +17.2% |
| 1996 | 90,000 current US$ | -73.5% |
| 1997 | 30,000 current US$ | -66.7% |
| 1998 | 30,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 110,000 current US$ | +266.7% |
| 2000 | 30,000 current US$ | -72.7% |
| 2007 | 180,000 current US$ | +500.0% |
| 2008 | 20,000 current US$ | -88.9% |
| 2015 | 2,496 current US$ | -87.5% |
| 2016 | 1,853 current US$ | -25.8% |
| 2017 | 1,889 current US$ | +1.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 26,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 241,500 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 620,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 250,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 700,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 76,667 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | 3 |
| 2010s | 2,079 current US$ | 1,853 current US$ | 2,496 current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
More aid effectiveness data for Eswatini
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24,761 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1,889 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 585,648 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 13.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 912,632 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 178,216 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 7.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 165,318 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -567,147 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -415,180 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Eswatini?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Eswatini was 1,889 current US$ in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 700,000 current US$ in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,853 current US$ in 2016.
- How does Eswatini rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Eswatini ranks 141st out of 151 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is down 99.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.