Eswatini vs Vanuatu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Eswatini
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1,889 current US$ against 1,387 current US$ in Vanuatu, a difference of 502 current US$.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Vanuatu's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 141st and Vanuatu ranks 143rd of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 30,000 current US$ | 37,500 current US$ | 7,500 current US$ | Vanuatu |
| 1980s | 40,000 current US$ | 90,000 current US$ | 50,000 current US$ | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 2,496 current US$ | 1,387 current US$ | 1,109 current US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Eswatini or Vanuatu?
- Eswatini, at 1,889 current US$ against 1,387 current US$ in Vanuatu as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Eswatini and Vanuatu?
- 502 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Vanuatu?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2015.
- How do Eswatini and Vanuatu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Eswatini ranks 141st and Vanuatu ranks 143rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.