Latvia vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps
Latvia
60,000 current US$
in 2004
Russia
90,000 current US$
in 2004
Latvia rank
92nd
Russia rank
89th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps over time
- Latvia
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 90,000 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 30,000 current US$.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.5 times Latvia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 92nd and Russia ranks 89th of 151 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 257,500 current US$ | 590,000 current US$ | 332,500 current US$ | Russia |
| 2000s | 44,000 current US$ | 450,000 current US$ | 406,000 current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Latvia or Russia?
- Russia, at 90,000 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Latvia and Russia?
- 30,000 current US$, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Russia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 92nd and Russia ranks 89th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.