Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Russian Federation

Russian Federation: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps was 90,000 current US$ in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
90,000 current US$
Change on year
down 10.0%
World rank
89th
of 151 countries
All-time high
17.70 million current US$
in 1992
All-time low
20,000 current US$
in 1994
Years of data
13
1992–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Russian Federation, 1992–2004

05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M1992199820041992: 17.7M current US$1993: 8.9M current US$1994: 20.0k current US$1995: 860.0k current US$1996: 670.0k current US$1997: 1.1M current US$1998: 380.0k current US$1999: 170.0k current US$2000: 1.5M current US$2001: 240.0k current US$2002: 340.0k current US$2003: 100.0k current US$2004: 90.0k current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

In 2004, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Russian Federation stood at 90,000 current US$.

The figure is down 10.0% on the previous year and up 350.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Russian Federation peaked at 17.70 million current US$ in 1992 and was at its lowest, 20,000 current US$, in 1994.

Russian Federation ranks 89th of 151 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Russian Federation, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled in Russian Federation, 1992 to 2004.
Year current US$ Change
1992 17.70 million current US$
1993 8.86 million current US$ -49.9%
1994 20,000 current US$ -99.8%
1995 860,000 current US$ +4200.0%
1996 670,000 current US$ -22.1%
1997 1.14 million current US$ +70.1%
1998 380,000 current US$ -66.7%
1999 170,000 current US$ -55.3%
2000 1.48 million current US$ +770.6%
2001 240,000 current US$ -83.8%
2002 340,000 current US$ +41.7%
2003 100,000 current US$ -70.6%
2004 90,000 current US$ -10.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 3.73 million current US$ 20,000 current US$ 17.70 million current US$ 8
2000s 450,000 current US$ 90,000 current US$ 1.48 million current US$ 5

Countries ranked near Russian Federation

  1. 86 Gabon 107,871 current US$ compare
  2. 87 Sri Lanka 104,629 current US$ compare
  3. 88 China 100,022 current US$ compare
  4. 89 Mauritius 90,000 current US$ compare
  5. 89 Samoa 90,000 current US$
  6. 92 Latvia 60,000 current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 197 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Russian Federation

All data for Russian Federation →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Russian Federation?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Russian Federation was 90,000 current US$ in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Russian Federation?
The highest recorded value was 17.70 million current US$ in 1992.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Russian Federation?
The lowest recorded value was 20,000 current US$ in 1994.
How does Russian Federation rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
Russian Federation ranks 89th out of 151 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Russian Federation?
Over the last ten years it is up 350.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Russian Federation. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/russian-federation/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Russian Federation</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,426 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.