Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 0.2942 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Russian Federation, 1992–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2004, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Russian Federation stood at 0.2942 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.4% on the previous year and down 59.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Russian Federation peaked at 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0.0305 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1999.
That places Russian Federation 144th out of 171 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.1062 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.8% |
| 1994 | 0.7338 current US$ per square kilometre | +591.0% |
| 1995 | 0.2351 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.0% |
| 1996 | 0.3303 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.5% |
| 1997 | 0.3395 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1998 | 0.199 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0305 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.7% |
| 2000 | 0.395 current US$ per square kilometre | +1194.6% |
| 2001 | 0.2723 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 2002 | 0.3242 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 2003 | 0.2985 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2004 | 0.2942 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6603 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0305 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.3168 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2723 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.395 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
- 141 Iran, Islamic Republic of 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 142 Mexico 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 143 New Caledonia 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 145 Algeria 0.2808 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 146 Argentina 0.0757 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 147 Belarus 0.0746 current US$ per square kilometre
More aid effectiveness data for Russian Federation
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 22.99 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 90,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.20 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 160.07 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 12.15 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 98.31 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.89 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.91 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.82 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Russian Federation?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Russian Federation was 0.2942 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0305 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- How does Russian Federation rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Russian Federation ranks 144th out of 171 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Russian Federation?
- Over the last ten years it is down 59.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.