Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Iran, Islamic Republic of
Iran, Islamic Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.57 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 83.5%
World rank
141st
of 171 countries
All-time high
58.49 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1978
All-time low
-36.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1990
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Iran, Islamic Republic of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Iran, Islamic Republic of stood at 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 83.5% on the previous year and up 10.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Iran, Islamic Republic of peaked at 58.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 1978 and was at its lowest, -36.14 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1990.
That places Iran, Islamic Republic of 141st out of 171 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Iran, Islamic Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1412 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0982 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0798 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1964 | 0.0982 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 1965 | 0.086 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0798 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1967 | 0.1105 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 1968 | 0.2149 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.4% |
| 1969 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +625.7% |
| 1970 | 7.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +370.9% |
| 1971 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.5% |
| 1972 | -0.3807 current US$ per square kilometre | -118.2% |
| 1973 | -0.2886 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 1974 | 0.3131 current US$ per square kilometre | -208.5% |
| 1975 | 0.2701 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1976 | 0.2333 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1977 | 20.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +8729.0% |
| 1978 | 58.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +184.0% |
| 1979 | -0.1719 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.3% |
| 1980 | 14.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -8350.0% |
| 1981 | -0.6754 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.8% |
| 1982 | -5.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +692.7% |
| 1983 | -5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1984 | -4.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1985 | -4.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1986 | 0.7675 current US$ per square kilometre | -115.7% |
| 1987 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.2% |
| 1988 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1989 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.5% |
| 1990 | -36.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -1767.4% |
| 1991 | -2.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.0% |
| 1992 | -29.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +1077.7% |
| 1993 | -3.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.8% |
| 1994 | -2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 1995 | 35.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -1501.0% |
| 1996 | 35.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1997 | 43.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 1998 | 29.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 1999 | 29.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2000 | 27.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2001 | 21.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 2002 | 10.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.2% |
| 2003 | 6.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 2004 | 12.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.2% |
| 2005 | -1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -112.8% |
| 2006 | -4.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +190.5% |
| 2007 | -7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.5% |
| 2008 | -10.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.7% |
| 2009 | -10.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2010 | -4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.0% |
| 2011 | -8.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.9% |
| 2012 | 10.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -234.5% |
| 2013 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.4% |
| 2014 | -25.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -1210.6% |
| 2015 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.8% |
| 2016 | -11.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -724.7% |
| 2017 | 3.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -135.9% |
| 2018 | 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 2019 | 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +184.9% |
| 2020 | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2021 | 26.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +272.2% |
| 2022 | 15.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.6% |
| 2023 | 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2742 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0798 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 8.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3807 current US$ per square kilometre | 58.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.1124 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 9.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 12.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Iran, Islamic Republic of
- 138 Mongolia 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Libya 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 140 French Polynesia 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 142 Mexico 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 143 New Caledonia 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 144 Russian Federation 0.2942 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 15.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 35,035 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 52,160 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 21.86 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 126.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 17.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 166,563 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 19.01 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.17 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Iran, Islamic Republic of was 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 58.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 1978.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was -36.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- How does Iran, Islamic Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 141st out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Iran, Islamic Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.