Oman vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps over time
- Oman
- Tanzania
How they compare
Oman currently reports 12.50 million current US$ against 9.63 million current US$ in Tanzania, a difference of 2.87 million current US$.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.3 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania ahead.
Oman ranks 15th and Tanzania ranks 16th of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18,333 current US$ | 14.28 million current US$ | 14.26 million current US$ | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 12.50 million current US$ | 8.84 million current US$ | 3.66 million current US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Oman or Tanzania?
- Oman, at 12.50 million current US$ against 9.63 million current US$ in Tanzania as of 2003.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Oman and Tanzania?
- 2.87 million current US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Tanzania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2003.
- How do Oman and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Oman ranks 15th and Tanzania ranks 16th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.