Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of

Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps was 9.63 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
9.63 million current US$
Change on year
down 4.5%
World rank
16th
of 151 countries
All-time high
70.63 million current US$
in 2002
All-time low
10,000 current US$
in 1967
Years of data
57
1967–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1967–2023

020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196719952023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of is 9.63 million current US$, measured in 2023.

The figure is down 4.5% on the previous year and down 27.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 70.63 million current US$ in 2002 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1967.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th of 151 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1967 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
1967 10,000 current US$
1968 20,000 current US$ +100.0%
1969 10,000 current US$ -50.0%
1970 10,000 current US$ +0.0%
1971 20,000 current US$ +100.0%
1972 15,000 current US$ -25.0%
1973 10,000 current US$ -33.3%
1974 40,000 current US$ +300.0%
1975 370,000 current US$ +825.0%
1976 1.71 million current US$ +362.2%
1977 220,000 current US$ -87.1%
1978 4.80 million current US$ +2081.8%
1979 5.34 million current US$ +11.2%
1980 2.46 million current US$ -53.9%
1981 7.26 million current US$ +195.1%
1982 1.47 million current US$ -79.8%
1983 4.53 million current US$ +208.2%
1984 4.66 million current US$ +2.9%
1985 3.64 million current US$ -21.9%
1986 3.19 million current US$ -12.4%
1987 2.12 million current US$ -33.5%
1988 6.80 million current US$ +220.8%
1989 4.33 million current US$ -36.3%
1990 14.26 million current US$ +229.3%
1991 11.85 million current US$ -16.9%
1992 18.26 million current US$ +54.1%
1993 21.19 million current US$ +16.0%
1994 8.18 million current US$ -61.4%
1995 11.92 million current US$ +45.7%
1996 10.23 million current US$ -14.2%
1997 7.33 million current US$ -28.3%
1998 61.02 million current US$ +732.5%
1999 18.66 million current US$ -69.4%
2000 7.41 million current US$ -60.3%
2001 16.13 million current US$ +117.7%
2002 70.63 million current US$ +337.9%
2003 8.84 million current US$ -87.5%
2004 17.56 million current US$ +98.6%
2005 6.28 million current US$ -64.2%
2006 14.70 million current US$ +134.1%
2007 13.76 million current US$ -6.4%
2008 18.53 million current US$ +34.7%
2009 21.17 million current US$ +14.2%
2010 22.45 million current US$ +6.0%
2011 25.68 million current US$ +14.4%
2012 22.79 million current US$ -11.3%
2013 13.34 million current US$ -41.5%
2014 16.36 million current US$ +22.6%
2015 12.11 million current US$ -26.0%
2016 13.98 million current US$ +15.4%
2017 13.51 million current US$ -3.3%
2018 12.23 million current US$ -9.5%
2019 12.06 million current US$ -1.4%
2020 12.41 million current US$ +2.9%
2021 14.82 million current US$ +19.5%
2022 10.09 million current US$ -32.0%
2023 9.63 million current US$ -4.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 13,333 current US$ 10,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 3
1970s 1.25 million current US$ 10,000 current US$ 5.34 million current US$ 10
1980s 4.05 million current US$ 1.47 million current US$ 7.26 million current US$ 10
1990s 18.29 million current US$ 7.33 million current US$ 61.02 million current US$ 10
2000s 19.50 million current US$ 6.28 million current US$ 70.63 million current US$ 10
2010s 16.45 million current US$ 12.06 million current US$ 25.68 million current US$ 10
2020s 11.74 million current US$ 9.63 million current US$ 14.82 million current US$ 4

Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of

  1. 13 Mali 19.35 million current US$ compare
  2. 14 Mozambique 17.60 million current US$ compare
  3. 15 Oman 12.50 million current US$ compare
  4. 17 Kenya 9.57 million current US$ compare
  5. 18 Lebanon 9.20 million current US$ compare
  6. 19 Morocco 8.84 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 197 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania, United Republic of

All data for Tanzania, United Republic of →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of was 9.63 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 70.63 million current US$ in 2002.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1967.
How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th out of 151 countries with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is down 27.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/tanzania/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,426 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.