East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8234 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 17.38 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 22.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Ecuador ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 44 groups.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0441 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1806 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1365 current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6756 current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.82 current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.85 current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 55 current US$ per square kilometre | 52.62 current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8234 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Ecuador?
- 17.38 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Ecuador?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Ecuador rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.