Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Ecuador
Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
18.2 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.6%
World rank
33rd
of 149 countries
All-time high
87.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
All-time low
0.0722 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1966
Years of data
58
1966–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Ecuador, 1966–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.6% on the previous year and down 69.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Ecuador peaked at 87.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0722 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
That places Ecuador 33rd out of 149 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 0.0722 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0.1084 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1968 | 0.2167 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1969 | 0.3251 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1970 | 0.289 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1971 | 0.2529 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1972 | 0.2529 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.5057 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1974 | 0.4696 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1975 | 0.6502 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 1976 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.1% |
| 1977 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.1% |
| 1978 | 3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +127.7% |
| 1979 | 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.8% |
| 1980 | 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 1981 | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1982 | 5.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1983 | 6.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1984 | 21.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +241.6% |
| 1985 | 6.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.7% |
| 1986 | 8.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.8% |
| 1987 | 12.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 1988 | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1989 | 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1990 | 12.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1991 | 16.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1992 | 31.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.8% |
| 1993 | 28.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1994 | 44.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 1995 | 35.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 1996 | 30.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1997 | 35 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1998 | 32.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1999 | 25.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2000 | 24.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2001 | 22.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2002 | 31.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 2003 | 50.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.2% |
| 2004 | 71.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.4% |
| 2005 | 63.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2006 | 87.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 2007 | 77.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 2008 | 72.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2009 | 48.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.6% |
| 2010 | 47.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2011 | 48.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2012 | 60.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2013 | 60.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 78.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 2015 | 50.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.4% |
| 2016 | 38.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2017 | 29.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 2018 | 36.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2019 | 34.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2020 | 32.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2021 | 29.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2022 | 17.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.6% |
| 2023 | 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1806 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0722 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3251 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1970s | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2529 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 29.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 55 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 87.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 48.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 78.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 24.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 30 Cambodia 20.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Morocco 19.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Jamaica 19.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Togo 18.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Kenya 16.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Mali 15.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Ecuador
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 909,618 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 28.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 596,171 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 180.24 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Ecuador?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Ecuador was 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 87.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0722 current US$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Ecuador rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 69.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.