East Asia & Pacific vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific
0.5389 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
14.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
East Asia & Pacific rank
38th
Israel rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Israel
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 14.33 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5389 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 26.6 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Israel ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Israel ranks 38th of 44 groups.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0317 current US$ per square kilometre 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre Israel
1970s 0.6978 current US$ per square kilometre 9.1 current US$ per square kilometre 8.41 current US$ per square kilometre Israel
1980s 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8731 current US$ per square kilometre Israel
1990s 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre 15.58 current US$ per square kilometre 13.82 current US$ per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific or Israel?
Israel, at 14.33 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5389 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific and Israel?
13.79 current US$ per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Israel?
31 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 1996.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Israel rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Israel ranks 38th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/israel/">East Asia & Pacific vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.