Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 0.5389 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific recorded 0.5389 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 2.3% on the previous year and down 65.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places East Asia & Pacific 38th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.0029 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0.0115 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0312 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0812 current US$ per square kilometre | +160.5% |
| 1970 | 0.1693 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.6% |
| 1971 | 0.2918 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.4% |
| 1972 | 0.3058 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1973 | 0.7497 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.2% |
| 1974 | 0.8194 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1975 | 0.8456 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1976 | 0.9043 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1977 | 0.8493 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1978 | 0.5677 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.2% |
| 1979 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +159.8% |
| 1980 | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.3% |
| 1981 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.4% |
| 1982 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1983 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 1984 | 0.7391 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 1985 | 0.7707 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1986 | 0.8797 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1987 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.5% |
| 1988 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 1989 | 0.7576 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1990 | 0.5952 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1991 | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +256.0% |
| 1992 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1993 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1994 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1995 | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1996 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 1997 | 0.9211 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.5% |
| 1998 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.5% |
| 1999 | 0.9821 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 2000 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +153.7% |
| 2001 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.8% |
| 2002 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 2003 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2004 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2005 | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.3% |
| 2006 | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 2007 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.0% |
| 2008 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.7% |
| 2009 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2010 | 1 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.1% |
| 2011 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 2012 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2013 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2014 | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.7232 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 2016 | 0.6186 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2017 | 0.6266 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2018 | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +209.9% |
| 2019 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.9% |
| 2020 | 0.8624 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 2021 | 0.944 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2022 | 0.527 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.2% |
| 2023 | 0.5389 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0141 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0812 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.6978 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1693 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7391 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5952 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6186 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7181 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.527 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.944 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 35 Kenya 16.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Mali 15.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Seychelles 14.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Israel 14.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Yemen 13.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Viet Nam 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Cyprus 11.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific was 0.5389 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is down 65.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.