Guatemala vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

Guatemala
21.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
22.38 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
29th
Mozambique rank
27th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mozambique
01020304050196719952023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 22.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 149 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 5.37 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2766 current US$ per square kilometre 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9258 current US$ per square kilometre 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 20.91 current US$ per square kilometre 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre 18.22 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 30.9 current US$ per square kilometre 16.72 current US$ per square kilometre 14.18 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 33.29 current US$ per square kilometre 26.52 current US$ per square kilometre 6.77 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 20.99 current US$ per square kilometre 21.16 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1625 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, Guatemala or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 22.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between Guatemala and Mozambique?
1.15 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mozambique?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Mozambique rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mozambique/">Guatemala vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.