Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Guatemala
Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
21.23 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 10.0%
World rank
29th
of 149 countries
All-time high
48.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2009
All-time low
0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1969
Years of data
57
1967–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Guatemala, 1967–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Guatemala is 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.0% on the previous year and down 46.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Guatemala peaked at 48.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1969.
Guatemala ranks 29th of 149 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1967 | 0.1866 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0.1866 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1970 | 0.1866 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1971 | 0.1866 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.3733 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1973 | 0.7465 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1974 | 0.1866 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1975 | 0.8399 current US$ per square kilometre | +350.0% |
| 1976 | 6.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +711.1% |
| 1977 | 8.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1978 | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.4% |
| 1979 | 3.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 1980 | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.9% |
| 1981 | 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.3% |
| 1982 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 1983 | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1984 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.3% |
| 1985 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1986 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1987 | 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.7% |
| 1988 | 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +124.2% |
| 1989 | 15.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.7% |
| 1990 | 11.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 1991 | 16.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.4% |
| 1992 | 14.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1993 | 25.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.3% |
| 1994 | 16.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1995 | 30.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.8% |
| 1996 | 23.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 1997 | 24.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1998 | 27.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1999 | 19.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.1% |
| 2000 | 14.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 2001 | 19.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.2% |
| 2002 | 25.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 2003 | 28.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 2004 | 37.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.9% |
| 2005 | 31.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 2006 | 31.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 31.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2008 | 41.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 2009 | 48.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 2010 | 34.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 2011 | 42.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2012 | 36.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 2013 | 39.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2014 | 36.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2015 | 31.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2016 | 34.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2017 | 21.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.4% |
| 2018 | 28.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 2019 | 25.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2020 | 21.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 2021 | 22.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2022 | 19.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2023 | 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1555 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1866 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1970s | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1866 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 20.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 30.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 42.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 20.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 26 Ghana 22.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Mozambique 22.38 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Niger 21.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Cambodia 20.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Morocco 19.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Jamaica 19.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Guatemala
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 27.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 4.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -158,126 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Guatemala?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Guatemala was 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 48.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre in 1969.
- How does Guatemala rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Guatemala ranks 29th out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.