Malawi vs Sierra Leone: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

Malawi
38.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
41.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
23rd
Sierra Leone rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • Malawi
  • Sierra Leone
050100150200197319982023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 23rd and Sierra Leone ranks 21st of 149 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4596 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4618 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0022 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1980s 0.4478 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8159 current US$ per square kilometre 0.368 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1990s 11.33 current US$ per square kilometre 10.49 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8403 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 25.16 current US$ per square kilometre 70.23 current US$ per square kilometre 45.06 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2010s 101.75 current US$ per square kilometre 7.62 current US$ per square kilometre 94.12 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, Malawi or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between Malawi and Sierra Leone?
3.13 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sierra Leone?
40 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Sierra Leone rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
Malawi ranks 23rd and Sierra Leone ranks 21st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sierra Leone: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/sierra-leone/">Malawi vs Sierra Leone: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.