Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Sierra Leone, 1977–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Sierra Leone recorded 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 30,027.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sierra Leone peaked at 189.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2017.
Sierra Leone ranks 21st of 149 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Sierra Leone, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1977 | 0.2771 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1979 | 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.6927 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1981 | 0.4156 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1982 | 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1984 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 1985 | 0.1385 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.0% |
| 1986 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +800.0% |
| 1987 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1988 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1989 | 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 1990 | 0.6927 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1991 | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.0% |
| 1992 | 0.1385 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.7% |
| 1993 | 0.4156 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1994 | 75.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +17966.6% |
| 1995 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.5% |
| 1996 | 19.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +1662.5% |
| 1997 | 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.1% |
| 1998 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.6% |
| 1999 | 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.2% |
| 2000 | 76.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +13650.0% |
| 2001 | 96.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 2002 | 127.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 2003 | 110.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 2004 | 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.5% |
| 2006 | 21.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +3775.0% |
| 2007 | 189.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +783.2% |
| 2008 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.2% |
| 2009 | 8.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +472.7% |
| 2010 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.5% |
| 2011 | 0.1385 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.9% |
| 2012 | 0.1385 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.1385 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 18.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +13599.9% |
| 2015 | 19.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2016 | 20 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.6% |
| 2023 | 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +48610.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.4618 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2771 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1980s | 0.8159 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1385 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 10.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1385 current US$ per square kilometre | 75.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 70.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre | 189.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | 7.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre | 20 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2020s | 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near Sierra Leone
- 18 Hong Kong, China 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Barbados 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Mauritius 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Oman 40.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Malawi 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Samoa 31.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sierra Leone
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 107,578 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 3.01 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 31.74 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 165,587 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 21.16 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 40.08 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 13.27 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sierra Leone?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sierra Leone was 41.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The highest recorded value was 189.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- How does Sierra Leone rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Sierra Leone ranks 21st out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Sierra Leone?
- Over the last ten years it is up 30,027.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.