Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Djibouti
16.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
18.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Djibouti rank
99th
Zimbabwe rank
96th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Djibouti
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600196419932023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 18.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre in Djibouti, a difference of 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Djibouti ahead.

Djibouti ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.8628 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0517 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8111 current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
1980s 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre 29.44 current US$ per square kilometre 22.54 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 7.25 current US$ per square kilometre 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre 27.37 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 20.06 current US$ per square kilometre 31.08 current US$ per square kilometre 11.02 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 120.53 current US$ per square kilometre 20.49 current US$ per square kilometre 100.04 current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
2020s 20.72 current US$ per square kilometre 21.99 current US$ per square kilometre 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Djibouti or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 18.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre in Djibouti as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
2.64 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Djibouti ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/zimbabwe/">Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.