Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 18.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
18.72 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 13.9%
World rank
96th
of 166 countries
All-time high
73.18 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2009
All-time low
0.0517 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1971
Years of data
58
1964–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Zimbabwe is 18.72 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 13.9% on the previous year and down 38.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Zimbabwe peaked at 73.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.0517 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 166 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 0.2585 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.4136 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 1966 | 0.3619 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1967 | 0.2068 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 1968 | 0.2585 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1969 | 0.2326 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1970 | 0.2068 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1971 | 0.0517 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1972 | 0.2585 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1973 | 0.1809 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 1974 | 0.2068 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1977 | 0.1034 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1978 | 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0517 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0775 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1981 | 21.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +27133.4% |
| 1982 | 31.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.2% |
| 1983 | 12.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.7% |
| 1984 | 24.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +97.3% |
| 1985 | 44.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.0% |
| 1986 | 28.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 1987 | 26.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1988 | 40.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.0% |
| 1989 | 64 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.8% |
| 1990 | 62.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1991 | 52.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 1992 | 70.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.9% |
| 1993 | 37.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.0% |
| 1994 | 34.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 1995 | 32.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1996 | 24.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 1997 | 11.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.4% |
| 1998 | 11.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1999 | 9.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2000 | 23.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.2% |
| 2001 | 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2002 | 16.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.8% |
| 2003 | 18.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2004 | 30.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.6% |
| 2005 | 35 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2006 | 17.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.5% |
| 2007 | 33.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.2% |
| 2008 | 54.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.3% |
| 2009 | 73.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 2010 | 23.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.3% |
| 2011 | 35.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 2012 | 55.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 2013 | 30.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.6% |
| 2014 | 18.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.2% |
| 2015 | 11.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 2016 | 14.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.1% |
| 2017 | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.8% |
| 2018 | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2019 | 9.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +282.0% |
| 2020 | 11.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 2021 | 35.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +203.3% |
| 2022 | 21.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.2% |
| 2023 | 18.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2887 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2068 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4136 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1970s | 0.1486 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0517 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2585 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1980s | 29.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0775 current US$ per square kilometre | 64 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 70.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 31.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 73.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 20.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 21.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 35.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 93 Sudan 21.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 94 India 21.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Cambodia 18.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 97 Suriname 18.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 98 Nepal 17.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 99 Djibouti 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Zimbabwe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Zimbabwe was 18.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 73.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0517 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- Zimbabwe ranks 96th out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 38.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.