India vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

India
21.51 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
18.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
94th
Zimbabwe rank
96th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • India
  • Zimbabwe
-100-50050196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 21.51 current US$ per square kilometre against 18.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1964 it was India ahead.

India ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 22.45 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2887 current US$ per square kilometre 22.16 current US$ per square kilometre India
1970s 23.08 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1486 current US$ per square kilometre 22.93 current US$ per square kilometre India
1980s 14.38 current US$ per square kilometre 29.44 current US$ per square kilometre 15.06 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 7.35 current US$ per square kilometre 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre 27.27 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s -3.56 current US$ per square kilometre 31.08 current US$ per square kilometre 34.64 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre 20.49 current US$ per square kilometre 17.83 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 7.16 current US$ per square kilometre 21.99 current US$ per square kilometre 14.83 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, India or Zimbabwe?
India, at 21.51 current US$ per square kilometre against 18.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between India and Zimbabwe?
2.79 current US$ per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Zimbabwe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do India and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
India ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/india/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/india/zimbabwe/">India vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.