East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
14.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
161.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
38th
Poland rank
36th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Poland
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 161.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.39 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 147.4 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 11.2 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th and Poland ranks 36th of 45 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 8.92 current US$ per square kilometre 317.03 current US$ per square kilometre 308.11 current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 6.37 current US$ per square kilometre 271.58 current US$ per square kilometre 265.21 current US$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Poland?
Poland, at 161.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.39 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Poland?
147.4 current US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Poland?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th and Poland ranks 36th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/poland/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.