Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 14.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
14.39 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 44.7%
Rank
38th
of 45 groups
All-time high
17.52 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
All-time low
0.1821 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) is 14.39 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 44.7% on the previous year and up 65.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) peaked at 17.52 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.1821 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) 38th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1934 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1821 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1963 | 0.1991 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1964 | 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1965 | 0.8102 current US$ per square kilometre | +248.6% |
| 1966 | 0.5458 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.6% |
| 1967 | 0.2902 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.8% |
| 1968 | 0.4779 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.7% |
| 1969 | 0.5809 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1970 | 0.9226 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.8% |
| 1971 | 0.716 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1972 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.1% |
| 1973 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1974 | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.7% |
| 1975 | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1976 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.9% |
| 1977 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 1978 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1979 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 1980 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 1981 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1982 | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 1983 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 1984 | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.3% |
| 1985 | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1986 | 6.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 1987 | 8.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 1988 | 8.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1989 | 8.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1990 | 11.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.8% |
| 1991 | 9.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 1992 | 11.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1993 | 10.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1994 | 10.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1995 | 8.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1996 | 6.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1997 | 7.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1998 | 7.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1999 | 5.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 2000 | 5.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2001 | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2002 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2003 | 7.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 2004 | 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2005 | 12.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.1% |
| 2006 | 8.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.8% |
| 2007 | 11.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 2008 | 17.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.7% |
| 2009 | 9.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.8% |
| 2010 | 7.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2011 | 6.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2012 | 5.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 2013 | 8.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.6% |
| 2014 | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 2015 | 4.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.2% |
| 2016 | 4.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2017 | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2018 | 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 2019 | 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2020 | 7.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 2021 | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2022 | 9.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2023 | 14.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3902 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1821 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8102 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.716 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 10.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- 35 Honduras 165.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Poland 161.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Burkina Faso 160.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Micronesia, Federated States of 160.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Belize 156.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Burundi 155.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Benin 145.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) was 14.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 17.52 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1821 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 65.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.