Nauru vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada … Canada square

Nauru
3,311 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
62.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada … Canada square over time

  • Nauru
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 3,311 current US$ per square kilometre against 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 3,249 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nauru's figure about 53.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.

Nauru ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 11th of 166 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 6,500 current US$ per square kilometre 58.88 current US$ per square kilometre 6,441 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2010s 2,073 current US$ per square kilometre 45.86 current US$ per square kilometre 2,027 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2020s 4,274 current US$ per square kilometre 71.07 current US$ per square kilometre 4,203 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Nauru or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Nauru, at 3,311 current US$ per square kilometre against 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Nauru and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
3,249 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Nauru ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 11th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Nauru vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.