Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
62.28 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 20.4%
Rank
11th
of 45 groups
All-time high
88.16 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
All-time low
0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), 1961–2023

020406080196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) is 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 20.4% on the previous year and up 0.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) peaked at 88.16 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) 11th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), 1961 to 2023.
Year current US$ per square kilometre Change
1961 0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre
1962 0.1003 current US$ per square kilometre +129.5%
1963 0.0819 current US$ per square kilometre -18.3%
1964 0.3078 current US$ per square kilometre +275.8%
1965 0.492 current US$ per square kilometre +59.8%
1966 0.7904 current US$ per square kilometre +60.6%
1967 0.8739 current US$ per square kilometre +10.6%
1968 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre +15.9%
1969 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre +7.2%
1970 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre +52.9%
1971 3 current US$ per square kilometre +80.7%
1972 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre +45.6%
1973 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre +3.1%
1974 6.84 current US$ per square kilometre +51.8%
1975 8.81 current US$ per square kilometre +28.8%
1976 7.84 current US$ per square kilometre -10.9%
1977 6.72 current US$ per square kilometre -14.3%
1978 9.43 current US$ per square kilometre +40.3%
1979 9.51 current US$ per square kilometre +0.9%
1980 9.83 current US$ per square kilometre +3.3%
1981 11.55 current US$ per square kilometre +17.5%
1982 13.61 current US$ per square kilometre +17.9%
1983 12.29 current US$ per square kilometre -9.7%
1984 17.58 current US$ per square kilometre +43.0%
1985 17.47 current US$ per square kilometre -0.7%
1986 14.98 current US$ per square kilometre -14.2%
1987 18.31 current US$ per square kilometre +22.3%
1988 19.57 current US$ per square kilometre +6.8%
1989 22.26 current US$ per square kilometre +13.8%
1990 21.57 current US$ per square kilometre -3.1%
1991 22.73 current US$ per square kilometre +5.4%
1992 23.45 current US$ per square kilometre +3.2%
1993 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre -30.5%
1994 13.86 current US$ per square kilometre -15.0%
1995 14.55 current US$ per square kilometre +4.9%
1996 13.84 current US$ per square kilometre -4.9%
1997 12.13 current US$ per square kilometre -12.3%
1998 14.84 current US$ per square kilometre +22.4%
1999 11.33 current US$ per square kilometre -23.6%
2000 9.4 current US$ per square kilometre -17.0%
2001 9.48 current US$ per square kilometre +0.9%
2002 17.61 current US$ per square kilometre +85.7%
2003 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre +32.5%
2004 28.73 current US$ per square kilometre +23.1%
2005 45.68 current US$ per square kilometre +59.0%
2006 48.76 current US$ per square kilometre +6.7%
2007 54.54 current US$ per square kilometre +11.8%
2008 60.91 current US$ per square kilometre +11.7%
2009 61.2 current US$ per square kilometre +0.5%
2010 70.82 current US$ per square kilometre +15.7%
2011 70.82 current US$ per square kilometre +0.0%
2012 76.57 current US$ per square kilometre +8.1%
2013 62.11 current US$ per square kilometre -18.9%
2014 56.1 current US$ per square kilometre -9.7%
2015 44.65 current US$ per square kilometre -20.4%
2016 39.97 current US$ per square kilometre -10.5%
2017 47.11 current US$ per square kilometre +17.9%
2018 54.93 current US$ per square kilometre +16.6%
2019 44.61 current US$ per square kilometre -18.8%
2020 55.64 current US$ per square kilometre +24.7%
2021 88.16 current US$ per square kilometre +58.4%
2022 78.2 current US$ per square kilometre -11.3%
2023 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre -20.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.532 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre 9
1970s 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre 9.51 current US$ per square kilometre 10
1980s 15.74 current US$ per square kilometre 9.83 current US$ per square kilometre 22.26 current US$ per square kilometre 10
1990s 16.46 current US$ per square kilometre 11.33 current US$ per square kilometre 23.45 current US$ per square kilometre 10
2000s 35.96 current US$ per square kilometre 9.4 current US$ per square kilometre 61.2 current US$ per square kilometre 10
2010s 56.77 current US$ per square kilometre 39.97 current US$ per square kilometre 76.57 current US$ per square kilometre 10
2020s 71.07 current US$ per square kilometre 55.64 current US$ per square kilometre 88.16 current US$ per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)

  1. 8 Ukraine 3,401 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  2. 9 Naoero 3,311 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  3. 10 Haiti 3,199 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  4. 11 Turks and Caicos Islands 2,274 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  5. 12 Barbados 1,488 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  6. 13 Jordan 1,395 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  7. 14 North Macedonia 944.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 213 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)

All data for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) was 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
The highest recorded value was 88.16 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 11th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.