Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) is 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 20.4% on the previous year and up 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) peaked at 88.16 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) 11th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1003 current US$ per square kilometre | +129.5% |
| 1963 | 0.0819 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 1964 | 0.3078 current US$ per square kilometre | +275.8% |
| 1965 | 0.492 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.8% |
| 1966 | 0.7904 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.6% |
| 1967 | 0.8739 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1968 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1969 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1970 | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.9% |
| 1971 | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.7% |
| 1972 | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 1973 | 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1974 | 6.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.8% |
| 1975 | 8.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.8% |
| 1976 | 7.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 1977 | 6.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1978 | 9.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 1979 | 9.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1980 | 9.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1981 | 11.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1982 | 13.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1983 | 12.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1984 | 17.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.0% |
| 1985 | 17.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1986 | 14.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1987 | 18.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1988 | 19.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1989 | 22.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1990 | 21.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1991 | 22.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1992 | 23.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1993 | 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 1994 | 13.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 1995 | 14.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1996 | 13.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1997 | 12.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1998 | 14.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 1999 | 11.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 2000 | 9.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 2001 | 9.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2002 | 17.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.7% |
| 2003 | 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 2004 | 28.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2005 | 45.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.0% |
| 2006 | 48.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2007 | 54.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2008 | 60.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2009 | 61.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2010 | 70.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 2011 | 70.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 76.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2013 | 62.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 2014 | 56.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 2015 | 44.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.4% |
| 2016 | 39.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2017 | 47.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 2018 | 54.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 2019 | 44.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2020 | 55.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 2021 | 88.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.4% |
| 2022 | 78.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2023 | 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.532 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 15.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 16.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 35.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 56.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 76.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 71.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 88.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- 8 Ukraine 3,401 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Naoero 3,311 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Haiti 3,199 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Turks and Caicos Islands 2,274 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Barbados 1,488 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Jordan 1,395 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 North Macedonia 944.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 121.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 460.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.49 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.04 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 658.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.95 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.40 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 303.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.70 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) was 62.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 88.16 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 11th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.