IBRD only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps

IBRD only
266.14 million current US$
in 2022
Tanzania, United Republic of
14.45 million current US$
in 2023
IBRD only rank
16th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time

  • IBRD only
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196519942023

How they compare

IBRD only currently reports 266.14 million current US$ against 14.45 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 251.69 million current US$.

That makes IBRD only's figure about 18.4 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 16th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 17th of 46 groups.

IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 34.40 million current US$ 19.32 million current US$ 15.08 million current US$ IBRD only
1980s 75.50 million current US$ 47.44 million current US$ 28.06 million current US$ IBRD only
1990s 188.32 million current US$ 78.51 million current US$ 109.82 million current US$ IBRD only
2000s 241.20 million current US$ 88.09 million current US$ 153.11 million current US$ IBRD only
2010s 139.84 million current US$ 77.36 million current US$ 62.48 million current US$ IBRD only
2020s 150.42 million current US$ 43.26 million current US$ 107.16 million current US$ IBRD only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, IBRD only or Tanzania, United Republic of?
IBRD only, at 266.14 million current US$ against 14.45 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between IBRD only and Tanzania, United Republic of?
251.69 million current US$, with IBRD only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Tanzania, United Republic of?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
IBRD only ranks 16th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 17th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/ibrd-only/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/ibrd-only/tanzania/">IBRD only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 7,224 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.