Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps was 14.45 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Tanzania, United Republic of recorded 14.45 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in 2023.
That represents a change of down 57.1% on the previous year and down 83.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 129.39 million current US$ in 2010 and was at its lowest, 460,000 current US$, in 1965.
That places Tanzania, United Republic of 17th out of 135 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 460,000 current US$ | — |
| 1966 | 730,000 current US$ | +58.7% |
| 1967 | 760,000 current US$ | +4.1% |
| 1968 | 1.31 million current US$ | +72.4% |
| 1969 | 2.48 million current US$ | +89.3% |
| 1970 | 3.24 million current US$ | +30.6% |
| 1971 | 4.15 million current US$ | +28.1% |
| 1972 | 4.63 million current US$ | +11.6% |
| 1973 | 7.40 million current US$ | +59.8% |
| 1974 | 18.17 million current US$ | +145.5% |
| 1975 | 23.71 million current US$ | +30.5% |
| 1976 | 19.59 million current US$ | -17.4% |
| 1977 | 35.01 million current US$ | +78.7% |
| 1978 | 37.59 million current US$ | +7.4% |
| 1979 | 39.66 million current US$ | +5.5% |
| 1980 | 32.17 million current US$ | -18.9% |
| 1981 | 32.76 million current US$ | +1.8% |
| 1982 | 39.84 million current US$ | +21.6% |
| 1983 | 40.40 million current US$ | +1.4% |
| 1984 | 31.61 million current US$ | -21.8% |
| 1985 | 37.02 million current US$ | +17.1% |
| 1986 | 54.90 million current US$ | +48.3% |
| 1987 | 49.19 million current US$ | -10.4% |
| 1988 | 77.81 million current US$ | +58.2% |
| 1989 | 78.72 million current US$ | +1.2% |
| 1990 | 78.55 million current US$ | -0.2% |
| 1991 | 89.14 million current US$ | +13.5% |
| 1992 | 94.78 million current US$ | +6.3% |
| 1993 | 80.86 million current US$ | -14.7% |
| 1994 | 76.55 million current US$ | -5.3% |
| 1995 | 59.57 million current US$ | -22.2% |
| 1996 | 91.20 million current US$ | +53.1% |
| 1997 | 63.96 million current US$ | -29.9% |
| 1998 | 69.63 million current US$ | +8.9% |
| 1999 | 80.85 million current US$ | +16.1% |
| 2000 | 68.75 million current US$ | -15.0% |
| 2001 | 66.63 million current US$ | -3.1% |
| 2002 | 69.89 million current US$ | +4.9% |
| 2003 | 85.48 million current US$ | +22.3% |
| 2004 | 93.93 million current US$ | +9.9% |
| 2005 | 84.73 million current US$ | -9.8% |
| 2006 | 95.31 million current US$ | +12.5% |
| 2007 | 90.07 million current US$ | -5.5% |
| 2008 | 119.24 million current US$ | +32.4% |
| 2009 | 106.85 million current US$ | -10.4% |
| 2010 | 129.39 million current US$ | +21.1% |
| 2011 | 126.16 million current US$ | -2.5% |
| 2012 | 111.19 million current US$ | -11.9% |
| 2013 | 88.63 million current US$ | -20.3% |
| 2014 | 70.71 million current US$ | -20.2% |
| 2015 | 41.37 million current US$ | -41.5% |
| 2016 | 54.28 million current US$ | +31.2% |
| 2017 | 52.89 million current US$ | -2.6% |
| 2018 | 54.32 million current US$ | +2.7% |
| 2019 | 44.61 million current US$ | -17.9% |
| 2020 | 45.33 million current US$ | +1.6% |
| 2021 | 50.75 million current US$ | +12.0% |
| 2022 | 33.69 million current US$ | -33.6% |
| 2023 | 14.45 million current US$ | -57.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.15 million current US$ | 460,000 current US$ | 2.48 million current US$ | 5 |
| 1970s | 19.32 million current US$ | 3.24 million current US$ | 39.66 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 47.44 million current US$ | 31.61 million current US$ | 78.72 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 78.51 million current US$ | 59.57 million current US$ | 94.78 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 88.09 million current US$ | 66.63 million current US$ | 119.24 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 77.36 million current US$ | 41.37 million current US$ | 129.39 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 36.06 million current US$ | 14.45 million current US$ | 50.75 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 37.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 34.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 54.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 121.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 16.94 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Tanzania, United Republic of was 14.45 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 129.39 million current US$ in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 460,000 current US$ in 1965.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 17th out of 135 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 83.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.