IDA blend vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps

IDA blend
76.92 million current US$
in 2022
Jordan
6.14 million current US$
in 2023
IDA blend rank
29th
Jordan rank
26th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time

  • IDA blend
  • Jordan
050.0M100.0M150.0M196719952023

How they compare

IDA blend currently reports 76.92 million current US$ against 6.14 million current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 70.78 million current US$.

That makes IDA blend's figure about 12.5 times Jordan's.

Across all 46 years both countries report, IDA blend has been ahead every year.

IDA blend ranks 29th and Jordan ranks 26th of 46 groups.

IDA blend has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 13.10 million current US$ 475,000 current US$ 12.63 million current US$ IDA blend
1980s 34.89 million current US$ 417,222 current US$ 34.48 million current US$ IDA blend
1990s 39.62 million current US$ 437,500 current US$ 39.18 million current US$ IDA blend
2000s 80.71 million current US$ 1.20 million current US$ 79.52 million current US$ IDA blend
2010s 80.57 million current US$ 2.46 million current US$ 78.11 million current US$ IDA blend
2020s 73.24 million current US$ 9.09 million current US$ 64.15 million current US$ IDA blend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, IDA blend or Jordan?
IDA blend, at 76.92 million current US$ against 6.14 million current US$ in Jordan as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between IDA blend and Jordan?
70.78 million current US$, with IDA blend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Jordan?
46 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA blend and Jordan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
IDA blend ranks 29th and Jordan ranks 26th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/ida-blend/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/ida-blend/jordan/">IDA blend vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 7,224 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.