Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in IDA blend
IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps was 76.92 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in IDA blend, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
IDA blend recorded 76.92 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in 2022.
The figure is up 15.0% on the previous year and down 19.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in IDA blend peaked at 170.28 million current US$ in 2007 and was at its lowest, 2.60 million current US$, in 1970.
IDA blend ranks 29th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in IDA blend, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 2.60 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 5.27 million current US$ | +102.7% |
| 1972 | 6.45 million current US$ | +22.4% |
| 1973 | 7.59 million current US$ | +17.7% |
| 1974 | 9.10 million current US$ | +19.9% |
| 1975 | 12.15 million current US$ | +33.5% |
| 1976 | 10.63 million current US$ | -12.5% |
| 1977 | 14.46 million current US$ | +36.0% |
| 1978 | 20.95 million current US$ | +44.9% |
| 1979 | 41.83 million current US$ | +99.7% |
| 1980 | 22.05 million current US$ | -47.3% |
| 1981 | 24.96 million current US$ | +13.2% |
| 1982 | 36.06 million current US$ | +44.5% |
| 1983 | 21.11 million current US$ | -41.5% |
| 1984 | 42.96 million current US$ | +103.5% |
| 1985 | 30.11 million current US$ | -29.9% |
| 1986 | 53.11 million current US$ | +76.4% |
| 1987 | 35.57 million current US$ | -33.0% |
| 1988 | 48.11 million current US$ | +35.3% |
| 1989 | 52.61 million current US$ | +9.4% |
| 1990 | 50.48 million current US$ | -4.0% |
| 1991 | 47.65 million current US$ | -5.6% |
| 1992 | 46.42 million current US$ | -2.6% |
| 1993 | 49.60 million current US$ | +6.9% |
| 1994 | 52.67 million current US$ | +6.2% |
| 1995 | 45.00 million current US$ | -14.6% |
| 1996 | 46.12 million current US$ | +2.5% |
| 1997 | 34.29 million current US$ | -25.7% |
| 1998 | 34.34 million current US$ | +0.1% |
| 1999 | 43.73 million current US$ | +27.3% |
| 2000 | 34.88 million current US$ | -20.2% |
| 2001 | 37.91 million current US$ | +8.7% |
| 2002 | 31.40 million current US$ | -17.2% |
| 2003 | 6.82 million current US$ | -78.3% |
| 2004 | 46.16 million current US$ | +576.8% |
| 2005 | 54.31 million current US$ | +17.7% |
| 2006 | 143.40 million current US$ | +164.0% |
| 2007 | 170.28 million current US$ | +18.7% |
| 2008 | 157.89 million current US$ | -7.3% |
| 2009 | 124.06 million current US$ | -21.4% |
| 2010 | 140.79 million current US$ | +13.5% |
| 2011 | 119.30 million current US$ | -15.3% |
| 2012 | 95.76 million current US$ | -19.7% |
| 2013 | 63.41 million current US$ | -33.8% |
| 2014 | 98.43 million current US$ | +55.2% |
| 2015 | 98.66 million current US$ | +0.2% |
| 2016 | 66.02 million current US$ | -33.1% |
| 2017 | 37.90 million current US$ | -42.6% |
| 2018 | 39.08 million current US$ | +3.1% |
| 2019 | 46.39 million current US$ | +18.7% |
| 2020 | 75.89 million current US$ | +63.6% |
| 2021 | 66.91 million current US$ | -11.8% |
| 2022 | 76.92 million current US$ | +15.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 13.10 million current US$ | 2.60 million current US$ | 41.83 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 36.66 million current US$ | 21.11 million current US$ | 53.11 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 45.03 million current US$ | 34.29 million current US$ | 52.67 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 80.71 million current US$ | 6.82 million current US$ | 170.28 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 80.57 million current US$ | 37.90 million current US$ | 140.79 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 73.24 million current US$ | 66.91 million current US$ | 76.92 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near IDA blend
- 26 Jordan 6.14 million current US$ compare
- 27 India 5.07 million current US$ compare
- 28 Chile 4.58 million current US$ compare
- 29 Ghana 3.85 million current US$ compare
- 30 Slovakia 3.83 million current US$ compare
- 31 Pakistan 3.81 million current US$ compare
- 32 Zimbabwe 3.66 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for IDA blend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 13.45 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.88 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 202.73 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 612.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 62.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 438.92 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 753.26 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 317.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 59.79 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 324.78 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in IDA blend?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in IDA blend was 76.92 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in IDA blend?
- The highest recorded value was 170.28 million current US$ in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in IDA blend?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.60 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does IDA blend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- IDA blend ranks 29th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps rising or falling in IDA blend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA blend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.