Angola vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Angola
0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nicaragua
0.1929 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
106th
Nicaragua rank
107th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Angola
  • Nicaragua
-2000200400197219972023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1929 current US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0366 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 106th and Nicaragua ranks 107th of 134 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre 3.91 current US$ per square kilometre 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre 31.39 current US$ per square kilometre 28.77 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0.8627 current US$ per square kilometre 199.55 current US$ per square kilometre 198.68 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre 280.62 current US$ per square kilometre 277.43 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0.909 current US$ per square kilometre 69.19 current US$ per square kilometre 68.28 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0.2251 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8168 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5918 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Angola or Nicaragua?
Angola, at 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1929 current US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2021.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Angola and Nicaragua?
0.0366 current US$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nicaragua?
39 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2021.
How do Angola and Nicaragua rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Angola ranks 106th and Nicaragua ranks 107th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/nicaragua/">Angola vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.