Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Angola
Angola: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Angola, 1975–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2021, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Angola stood at 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 4.1% on the previous year and down 75.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Angola peaked at 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
Angola ranks 106th of 134 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Angola, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 0.1123 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +1071.4% |
| 1977 | 0.1043 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.1% |
| 1978 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +1407.7% |
| 1979 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1980 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.9% |
| 1981 | 4.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.8% |
| 1982 | 4.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1983 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.0% |
| 1984 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.5% |
| 1985 | 0.7219 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 1986 | 3.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +397.8% |
| 1987 | 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 1988 | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.5% |
| 1989 | 0.0642 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.1% |
| 1990 | 0.0401 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1991 | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +4940.0% |
| 1992 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.0% |
| 1993 | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.3% |
| 1995 | 0.016 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1996 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +6900.0% |
| 1997 | 0.6658 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 1998 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.8% |
| 1999 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2000 | 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +316.8% |
| 2001 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.1% |
| 2002 | 0.7781 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.4% |
| 2003 | 0.4893 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0963 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.3% |
| 2005 | 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +3416.7% |
| 2006 | 5.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.9% |
| 2007 | 5.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2008 | 4.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2009 | 3.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 2010 | 0.9866 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.5% |
| 2011 | 0.9385 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2012 | 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.0% |
| 2013 | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +25175.5% |
| 2014 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.8% |
| 2017 | 0.2375 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.4% |
| 2020 | 0.2206 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2021 | 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.8358 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1043 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1980s | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0642 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8627 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2000s | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0963 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.909 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 2020s | 0.2251 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2206 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 103 Brazil 0.3089 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 104 Mexico 0.2967 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 105 Panama 0.2399 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 Nicaragua 0.1929 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 108 Argentina 0.1697 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 109 Mongolia 0.1374 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Angola
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 684,387 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 34.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 136,131 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 26.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 231,335 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 842,610 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.46 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Angola?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Angola was 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Angola rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Angola ranks 106th out of 134 countries with data for 2021.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is down 75.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.