Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Mexico
Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 0.2967 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Mexico, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Mexico is 0.2967 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 31.4% on the previous year and down 78.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Mexico peaked at 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, -1.9 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1991.
That places Mexico 104th out of 134 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Mexico, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0103 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0206 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0257 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0257 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0154 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0206 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1979 | 0.3652 current US$ per square kilometre | +1675.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0309 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.5% |
| 1981 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0103 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0103 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.036 current US$ per square kilometre | +250.0% |
| 1991 | -1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -5371.4% |
| 1995 | 0.5196 current US$ per square kilometre | -127.4% |
| 1996 | 0.4218 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 1997 | 0.7253 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.3% |
| 1999 | -0.0669 current US$ per square kilometre | -1400.0% |
| 2000 | -0.1029 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.8% |
| 2001 | -0.2263 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.0% |
| 2002 | -0.1235 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.5% |
| 2003 | -0.6173 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 2004 | -0.0669 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.2% |
| 2005 | -0.1337 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2006 | -0.0412 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0309 current US$ per square kilometre | -175.0% |
| 2015 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +4444.5% |
| 2016 | 0.9711 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 2017 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 2018 | 0.2414 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.3% |
| 2019 | 0.0707 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0992 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 2021 | 0.1019 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2022 | 0.4328 current US$ per square kilometre | +324.8% |
| 2023 | 0.2967 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0499 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3652 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0163 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.036 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1990s | -0.0489 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7253 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 2000s | -0.1601 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6173 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0309 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2010s | 0.7595 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0707 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2020s | 0.2327 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0992 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4328 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 101 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0.3513 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 102 Azerbaijan 0.3151 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 103 Brazil 0.3089 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 105 Panama 0.2399 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 106 Angola 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 Nicaragua 0.1929 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Mexico
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 6.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,627 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 8.90 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions -75.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 83.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 132.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 5.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.81 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Mexico?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Mexico was 0.2967 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991.
- How does Mexico rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Mexico ranks 104th out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 78.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.