Cambodia vs High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Cambodia
11.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
High income
0.0003 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
46th
High income rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Cambodia
  • High income
0255075100196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0003 current US$ per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 46th and High income ranks 45th of 134 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia High income Difference Ahead
1970s 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0251 current US$ per square kilometre 7.17 current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia
1980s 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0056 current US$ per square kilometre 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia
1990s 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1041 current US$ per square kilometre 7.22 current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia
2000s 53.22 current US$ per square kilometre 0.023 current US$ per square kilometre 53.2 current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia
2010s 24.17 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0149 current US$ per square kilometre 24.15 current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 13.2 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0002 current US$ per square kilometre 13.2 current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Cambodia or High income?
Cambodia, at 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0003 current US$ per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Cambodia and High income?
11.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and High income?
42 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and High income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Cambodia ranks 46th and High income ranks 45th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/high-income/">Cambodia vs High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.